When discussing antonyms for impartial, it’s essential to understand that impartiality refers to the quality of being fair, unbiased, and without favoritism. Antonyms, on the other hand, are words that have opposite meanings to a given term. So, antonyms for impartial are words that convey partiality, bias, or unfairness in judgment.
Opposites of impartial can include words such as biased, prejudiced, partial, unfair, and discriminatory. These antonyms highlight the presence of favoritism, leaning one way over another, or making judgments based on personal feelings rather than objective criteria. Understanding these antonyms helps in identifying when fairness is lacking in a situation.
By recognizing and using antonyms for impartial, one can better grasp the concept of impartiality and the significance of objective judgment. Knowing these opposite terms can also help in differentiating between fair and biased actions or decisions, ultimately promoting fairness and equality in various aspects of life.
35 Antonyms for IMPARTIAL With Sentences
Here’s a complete list of opposite for impartial. Practice and let us know if you have any questions regarding IMPARTIAL antonyms.
Antonym | Sentence with Impartial | Sentence with Antonym |
---|---|---|
Biased | The judge remained impartial | The judge showed biased opinions |
Partial | She tried to be impartial | She was clearly partial to one side |
Prejudiced | It is important to be impartial | He was clearly prejudiced against them |
Unfair | The decision was made impartially | The decision was completely unfair |
Partisan | She approached the situation impartially | He approached it from a partisan perspective |
Biased | The report was impartial | The report was biased and one-sided |
One-sided | We need an impartial mediator | He didn’t believe in being one-sided |
Unjust | The judge acted impartially | The judge’s ruling was unjust |
Subjective | She remained impartial in her feedback | He was very subjective in his assessment |
Favoring | They decided to remain impartial | They were clearly favoring one side |
Interested | She approached the matter impartially | He was too interested in the outcome |
Partisan | She was always impartial | He was known for being partisan |
Discriminatory | The committee was expected to be impartial | Unfortunately, their decisions were discriminatory |
Unjust | The trial was conducted impartially | The final verdict was unjust |
Unbalanced | He tried to stay impartial | His perspective was clearly unbalanced |
Biased | The journalist strived to be impartial | However, the article seemed biased |
Inequitable | The judge acted impartially | The sentencing was deemed inequitable |
Partisan | They discussed the issues impartially | He always took a partisan stance |
Unjust | A truly impartial decision must be reached | Anything else would be unjust |
One-sided | The moderator remained impartial | The debater’s argument was one-sided |
Unfair | She handled the situation impartially | His actions were clearly unfair |
Bigoted | We must approach this impartially | He was known to be bigoted in his beliefs |
Favoring | The board members must be impartial | Avoid any appearance of favoring one side |
Discriminatory | Remaining impartial is crucial in this case | We cannot allow any discriminatory actions |
Unjust | His decision was based on impartial judgment | However, it seemed completely unjust |
Unbalanced | The jury was instructed to remain impartial | Any signs of being unbalanced were not permitted |
Biased | The doctor tried to be impartial | But his views were clearly biased |
Partisan | It is essential to remain impartial | Never let your views become partisan |
Unfair | The referee acted impartially | The game’s outcome was considered unfair |
Final Thoughts about Antonyms of IMPARTIAL
Having a partial perspective can lead to biased decisions and unfair treatment. When individuals show favoritism or prejudice, they are not being impartial and are at risk of overlooking important information or perspectives. On the contrary, being fair and unbiased ensures that all sides of a situation are considered, resulting in more balanced and just outcomes.
It is crucial to strive for impartiality in our decisions and actions, as it promotes equality and fosters trust in relationships and institutions. By acknowledging and addressing any biases or preferences, we can make more objective choices and create a more inclusive and just society.