Antonyms for arbitration refer to the opposite concepts or practices that are contrary to arbitration. When discussing antonyms for arbitration, we are referring to methods, processes, or resolutions that differ significantly from the practice of arbitration.
Unlike arbitration, which involves the use of a neutral third party to make a decision or settle a dispute, antonyms for arbitration may involve direct negotiation between the parties involved without the need for a mediator or arbitrator. Additionally, antonyms for arbitration may encompass situations where decisions are made unilaterally by one party rather than through a collaborative or mediated process.
In contrast to arbitration, where a resolution is reached through a binding decision by the arbitrator, antonyms for arbitration may involve outcomes that are non-binding or where each party retains full autonomy over their own decisions and actions.
35 Antonyms for ARBITRATION With Sentences
Here’s a complete list of opposite for arbitration. Practice and let us know if you have any questions regarding ARBITRATION antonyms.
Antonym | Sentence with Arbitration | Sentence with Antonym |
---|---|---|
Conflict | Arbitration is a method of resolving disputes. | Conflict often leads to heated arguments and fights. |
Disagreement | Both parties agreed to settle the matter through arbitration. | The disagreement remained unresolved and caused tension. |
Dispute | In case of a dispute, the parties can opt for arbitration. | The parties avoided going to court by avoiding dispute altogether. |
War | Instead of going to war, the countries decided to pursue arbitration. | Diplomatic solutions were sought instead of engaging in war. |
Battle | The two companies were locked in a legal battle until arbitration settled the issue. | The peaceful resolution outside the courtroom avoided the legal battle. |
Fight | Sometimes it is better to resolve conflicts through arbitration rather than a physical fight. | The issue was resolved amicably without resorting to a verbal fight. |
Confrontation | The parties had an intense confrontation before agreeing to arbitration. | There was no need for a confrontation as a peaceful settlement was reached. |
Contest | The matter was being handled as a legal contest until arbitration took place. | The need for a legal contest was avoided with the help of arbitration. |
Clash | The two parties were on the verge of a clash before deciding on arbitration. | The tensions that could have led to a violent clash were diffused through arbitration. |
Struggle | The best way to resolve the struggle was through arbitration. | The ongoing struggle was put to rest with a fair arbitration process. |
Discord | Arbitration aims to bring harmony in situations of discord. | The current state of discord can be resolved through arbitration. |
Division | Legal division can be bridged through the process of arbitration. | Without creating further division, the two parties reached a mutual agreement through arbitration. |
Difference | Arbitration can help address differences of opinion in a peaceful manner. | Respecting each other’s differences was essential in avoiding the need for arbitration. |
Quarrel | The heated quarrel was settled through arbitration. | Avoiding a verbal quarrel was made possible by opting for arbitration. |
Disunity | Arbitration can mend relationships marred by disunity. | Instead of prolonging the disunity, the parties chose to engage in arbitration. |
Friction | Arbitration can be a useful tool in reducing friction between individuals. | The ongoing friction was resolved peacefully through the process of arbitration. |
Disagreement | A professional arbitration is necessary in case of a disagreement between the parties. | The parties failed to reach a compromise due to their deep-seated disagreement. |
Dissension | Dissension among team members was resolved through arbitration. | The issue of dissension could not be resolved without resorting to arbitration. |
Hostility | Arbitration can help reduce the hostility between conflicting parties. | The level of hostility between the two nations was escalating, necessitating arbitration. |
Rivalry | The long-standing rivalry was put to rest through arbitration. | Instead of fueling the existing rivalry, the two parties opted for arbitration. |
Alienation | Arbitration aims to bridge the gap of alienation between individuals. | The feeling of alienation can be heightened if parties resort to arbitration. |
Strain | The tension and strain between the parties were resolved through arbitration. | The increasing strain between family members was alleviated without the need for arbitration. |
Feud | The long-standing feud was put to an end through arbitration. | Ongoing family feuds can take a toll on relationships, warranting arbitration. |
Enmity | The two countries decided to end their enmity through arbitration. | The deep-rooted enmity could only be resolved through peaceful arbitration. |
Vendetta | The families were on the brink of a familial vendetta until arbitration intervened. | The continuing vendetta between the two parties could only be halted by fair arbitration. |
Animosity | The level of animosity was reduced after successful arbitration. | The deep-seated animosity would continue to grow without effective arbitration. |
Detestation | The mutual detestation between coworkers was resolved through arbitration. | The level of detestation had reached a point where only arbitration could provide a possible resolution. |
Hatred | The hatred between the families was mended through arbitration. | Continuing to harbor hatred would only prolong the need for arbitration in resolving conflicts. |
Contention | The ongoing contention was finally settled through arbitration. | Immediate resolution was necessary as the level of contention was escalating beyond the reach of arbitration. |
Ill will | The situation of ill will was transformed through the process of arbitration. | Burying the feeling of ill will was crucial before the parties could engage in arbitration. |
Final Thoughts about Antonyms of ARBITRATION
In the realm of conflict resolution, avoiding arbitration and embracing direct negotiation can foster open communication and mutual understanding between parties. By steering clear of formal arbitration proceedings and opting for informal dialogue, individuals can streamline the resolution process and maintain greater control over the outcome. Choosing collaboration over adjudication allows for more flexibility in finding creative solutions that meet the unique needs of all parties involved.
Shifting away from reliance on arbitration towards cooperation and mediation can lead to more amicable and sustainable resolutions. By encouraging compromise and constructive dialogue, conflicts can be addressed efficiently and harmoniously, promoting long-term harmony and relationship-building. Embracing alternatives to arbitration can pave the way for productive discussions and mutually beneficial agreements, fostering stronger partnerships and promoting a culture of cooperation and understanding.