Antonyms for amendment are terms that represent concepts opposite to the idea of making changes or modifications to something. This can refer to situations where no alterations are made or when things remain unchanged. Antonyms for amendment can also signify resistance to adjusting or revising a document, policy, or law.
In contrast to the process of amending, which involves adding, deleting, or revising content, antonyms for amendment convey the notion of stability or the preservation of existing conditions. These terms highlight the absence of modifications and underscore the idea of leaving things as they are. Antonyms for amendment can also imply a reluctance or refusal to make any adjustments to an original text or regulation.
Understanding antonyms for amendment is essential for grasping the different ways in which change or lack thereof can be articulated. By recognizing these opposing concepts to amendment, one gains a clearer insight into the varying perspectives on the need for revision or the preference to maintain the status quo. Antonyms for amendment illuminate the contrasting views on whether to modify or retain the current state of affairs.
35 Antonyms for AMENDMENT With Sentences
Here’s a complete list of opposite for amendment. Practice and let us know if you have any questions regarding AMENDMENT antonyms.
| Antonym | Sentence with Amendment | Sentence with Antonym |
|---|---|---|
| Approval | The proposed amendment to the constitution was met with widespread support. | The original constitution met with widespread disapproval. |
| Retain | The amendment suggested that some sections of the law should be repealed. | The decision to retain the existing law was met with strong opposition. |
| Affirm | The judge asked the defendant to make an amendment to his statement. | The judge asked the defendant to make a denial instead of an affirmation. |
| Maintain | The committee members agreed to make an amendment to the proposal. | The committee members decided to abandon the proposal rather than maintain it. |
| Revocation | The amendment made to the contract included a clause for revocation under certain circumstances. | The removal of the clause meant there was no longer a possibility of revocation. |
| Reinstate | The amendment was unanimously agreed upon, and the previous rules were reinstated. | The decision to make the amendment also included the overturning of the previous rules. |
| Upheld | The court’s decision to approve the amendment was a sign that the law was being upheld. | The court’s decision to reject the amendment indicated that the law was not being upheld. |
| Permanent | The new amendment to the policy was seen as a permanent solution to the ongoing issue. | The rejection of the amendment meant that a temporary solution was still in place. |
| Retraction | The amendment to the agreement included a clause for the retraction of certain benefits. | The removal of the clause meant that there could be no retraction of the benefits later on. |
| Veto | The amendment needed the president’s approval, but he chose to exercise his power to veto it. | The proposal was made, but it was futile because it was vetoed by the president. |
| Nullify | The new clause added to the contract had the potential to nullify certain aspects of the agreement. | The decision not to add the clause meant that there was no risk of nullification in the contract. |
| Halt | The amendment to the traffic laws was seen as a step to halt the increasing number of accidents. | The decision not to make the amendment meant that measures were not being taken to halt the accidents. |
| Permit | The amendment allowed for permitting certain exceptions in cases where the standard rules didn’t apply. | The decision not to make the amendment meant that there was no provision for permitting exceptions in such cases. |
| Continue | The amendment acted as a roadblock and didn’t allow the project to continue as planned. | The decision to reject the amendment meant that there was no hindrance to the project, and it could continue smoothly. |
| Invalidation | The amendment was aimed at removing any possibility of invalidation of the contract. | The rejection of the amendment meant that there was still a risk of invalidation of the contract. |
| Sustain | The amendment assured that the existing policies would be sustained for the foreseeable future. | The rejection of the amendment indicated that the existing policies might not be sustainable in the long run. |
| Obviate | The adoption of the amendment was intended to obviate any potential lawsuits that could arise in the future. | The decision to reject the amendment meant that there was nothing in place to obviate the possibility of future lawsuits. |
| Introduce | The amendment was proposed to introduce changes that were deemed necessary for the industry to progress. | The rejection of the amendment indicated that there was no need to introduce any changes at this point. |
| Reverse | The new amendment was seen as a step backward from the progress that had been made in the previous years. | The decision not to make the amendment meant that there would be no reversal of the progress achieved. |
| Shorten | The amendment proposed in the contract sought to shorten the duration of the agreement and make it more flexible. | The rejection of the amendment indicated that there was no intention to shorten the duration of the agreement. |
| Abolish | The amendment included provisions to abolish outdated regulations that were no longer applicable. | The rejection of the amendment meant that the outdated regulations, unfortunately, continued to exist. |
| Acceptance | The amendment was met with acceptance from all parties involved, signifying a mutual agreement on the changes. | The rejection of the amendment indicated a lack of acceptance from the parties involved, causing disagreement on the changes. |
| Affirmation | The amendment was made with the goal of providing a stronger sense of affirmation to the principles outlined in the document. | The decision not to make the amendment meant that there was a lack of affirmation toward the principles in the document. |
| Acknowledgment | The proposed amendment required an acknowledgment of the mistakes made in the past and a commitment to rectify them. | The rejection of the amendment indicated a lack of acknowledgment toward the mistakes made in the past, leaving them unaddressed. |
| Surrender | The amendment required the opposite party to surrender certain privileges for the overall benefit of the partnership. | The rejection of the amendment meant that there would be no need for either party to surrender any privileges. |
| Approve | The committee decided to amend the rules after approving the necessary changes. | The committee members could not approve the proposed amendment and, therefore, did not make any changes to the existing rules. |
| Modify | The amendment requested to modify certain sections of the agreement to ensure fairness for both parties. | The rejection of the amendment meant that there was no attempt to change or modify any sections of the agreement, potentially leading to imbalances. |
| Confirm | The amendment needed to be confirmed by the board before being implemented. | The decision to reject the amendment meant that there was no confirmation from the board and, therefore, no further action was taken. |
| Nullification | The amendment was designed to avoid the nullification of the contract in the event of unforeseen circumstances. | The decision not to make the amendment meant that there was a risk of nullification of the contract if unforeseen events occurred. |
Final Thoughts about Antonyms of AMENDMENT
In this article, we explored different antonyms for the word “amendment.” While “amendment” signifies changes or additions made to a document or law, its antonyms such as preservation, stagnation, and conformity denote concepts of keeping things unchanged or unaltered. These contrasting terms highlight the significance of amendments in bringing about progress, evolution, and adaptation in various aspects of life.
Understanding the antonyms of “amendment” sheds light on the importance of embracing change and improvement. By recognizing the need for modifications and updates, we can foster growth, innovation, and resilience in our personal and collective endeavors, ultimately leading to a more dynamic and responsive society.