Antonyms for judicial review are legal principles that involve limitations on the power of courts to review and overturn legislative and executive actions. Unlike judicial review, which allows courts to interpret and declare laws and actions unconstitutional, antonyms for judicial review emphasize a more restrained approach towards the judiciary’s authority.
In contrast to judicial review, antonyms for this doctrine promote a deferential stance towards the decisions made by the legislative and executive branches. Rather than acting as a check on government branches, these principles uphold the notion of separation of powers and show respect for the roles and responsibilities assigned to each branch of government.
Antonyms for judicial review seek to maintain a balance of power between the judiciary and the other branches of government, aiming to prevent judicial overreach and uphold the principle of democratic governance. By recognizing the limitations on the judiciary’s authority to intervene in legislative and executive matters, these legal principles promote a system where each branch operates within its designated constitutional boundaries.
35 Antonyms for JUDICIAL REVIEW With Sentences
Here’s a complete list of opposite for judicial review. Practice and let us know if you have any questions regarding JUDICIAL REVIEW antonyms.
| Antonym | Sentence with Judicial Review | Sentence with Antonym |
|---|---|---|
| Legislation | The judicial review process allows courts to review the constitutionality of laws. | Legislation is the process by which laws are enacted by a legislative body without any judicial review. |
| Tyranny | Judicial review plays a crucial role in preventing tyranny by ensuring that government actions are within the bounds of the constitution. | Tyranny is the exercise of power in a manner that is not subject to judicial review and can lead to oppression. |
| Arbitrary | Judicial review helps to prevent arbitrary government decisions by holding them accountable to the constitution. | Arbitrary decisions are made without any consideration to the law and are not subject to judicial review. |
| Unchecked | The concept of judicial review ensures that the actions of the government are not left unchecked and are subject to scrutiny by the courts. | The absence of judicial review leads to unchecked power in the hands of government authorities. |
| Autocratic | Judicial review acts as a check against autocratic tendencies of the government by ensuring adherence to the constitution. | An autocratic government would not be constrained by the need for judicial review and could exercise power despotically. |
| Unconstitutional | Judicial review is the process through which courts determine if governmental actions are in line with the constitution. | Actions that are considered unconstitutional are those that would not pass the scrutiny of judicial review. |
| Arbitrary | Judicial review is a mechanism to prevent arbitrary exercises of power by ensuring that governmental actions are lawful. | Arbitrary decisions are those made without any legal basis and would not stand under judicial review. |
| Autonomy | Judicial review ensures the autonomy of the judiciary in interpreting and applying the law independently of other branches of government. | A lack of judicial review could compromise the autonomy of the judiciary leading to interference from other branches. |
| Obedience | The concept of judicial review ensures that governmental actions are always subject to obedience to the constitution. | In the absence of judicial review, obedience to the constitution may not be guaranteed. |
| Unaccountable | Judicial review is a mechanism to hold the government accountable by reviewing its actions in light of the constitution. | Without judicial review, the government may become unaccountable for its actions leading to abuse of power. |
| Despotic | Judicial review serves as a check against despotic tendencies by ensuring that governmental actions are lawful and constitutional. | A despotic regime would not be subject to judicial review and could act tyrannically without consequences. |
| Irresponsible | Judicial review helps to keep the government responsible for its actions by subjecting them to scrutiny. | In the absence of judicial review, the government may become irresponsible in its decision-making. |
| Arbitrary | Judicial review prevents arbitrary exercises of power by ensuring that governmental actions are in compliance with the law. | Arbitrary decisions are those made capriciously and without regard for legal standards or judicial review. |
| Unchecked | Judicial review prevents unchecked government actions by reviewing their constitutionality. | The absence of judicial review can lead to unchecked power in the hands of the government without oversight. |
| Autocratic | Judicial review acts as a safeguard against autocratic tendencies of the government by upholding the constitution. | An autocratic government is one that does not heed the principles upheld by judicial review and could act oppressively. |
| Void | The power of judicial review lies in its ability to declare actions of the government as void if they are unconstitutional. | Actions that are void are those that would not withstand legal scrutiny under judicial review. |
| Legitimate | Judicial review ensures that government actions are legitimate and in line with the constitution. | Illegitimate actions would not pass the test of judicial review and would be considered unconstitutional. |
| Injustice | Judicial review is a mechanism to prevent injustice by ensuring that all actions of the government are lawful. | Injustice is what occurs when the actions of the government are arbitrary and not subject to judicial review. |
| Partisan | Judicial review aims to be impartial and non-partisan in evaluating the constitutionality of laws and governmental actions. | Partisan decisions are those influenced by political bias and are not conducive to fair judicial review. |
| Inequitable | Judicial review strives to ensure that government actions are equitable and fair to all individuals. | Inequitable actions are those that would not pass the test of judicial review due to their unfair nature. |
| Regulate | Judicial review is the process of regulating the constitutionality of laws and governmental actions. | The absence of judicial review could lead to a lack of regulation and oversight of government actions. |
| Unrestrained | Judicial review acts as a restraint on governmental actions by ensuring they are within constitutional limits. | Unrestrained actions are those taken without consideration for legal limits or judicial review. |
| Anarchy | Judicial review is a bulwark against anarchy by ensuring that laws and government actions are upheld. | Anarchy results from the absence of law and judicial review would not be possible in such circumstances. |
| Corrupt | Judicial review plays a role in preventing corrupt practices by holding the government accountable to the constitution. | Corrupt actions are those that would not withstand the scrutiny of judicial review due to their unlawful nature. |
| Unjust | Judicial review safeguards against unjust governmental actions by ensuring they are constitutional. | Unjust actions are those that would be considered unconstitutional under the lens of judicial review. |
| Absolute | The concept of judicial review ensures that no branch of government has absolute power as they are all subject to scrutiny. | Absolute power is what could result from a lack of judicial review where governmental actions go unchecked. |
| Infringe | Judicial review prevents the infringement of individual rights by evaluating the constitutionality of government actions. | Infringements are actions that would not survive the test of judicial review as they violate fundamental rights. |
| Arbitrary | The process of judicial review helps to prevent arbitrary decisions by ensuring they comply with the law. | Arbitrary decisions are those made without any legal basis and would not withstand judicial review. |
| Spontaneous | Judicial review ensures that governmental actions are not spontaneous but deliberate and based on constitutional principles. | Spontaneous actions are those taken suddenly and without regard for legal standards or judicial review. |
Final Thoughts about Antonyms of JUDICIAL REVIEW
In contrast to the powerful oversight role of judicial review, alternative mechanisms like executive discretion and legislative supremacy lack the same level of checks and balances. When judicial review is absent, decisions made by the executive branch or legislative body may go unchallenged and potentially infringe on individual rights or overstep constitutional boundaries. Without the scrutiny of judicial review, there could be less accountability and balance in the exercise of governmental powers.
While judicial review provides a critical safeguard against abuse of authority and ensures adherence to the constitution, the absence of this oversight mechanism can lead to potential unchecked power and limited opportunities for redress. It underscores the importance of a system that includes judicial review to maintain a balance of power and protect against governmental overreach.