Antonyms for double jeopardy refer to situations where an individual is not subjected to repeated legal prosecution or punishment for the same offense. In essence, antonyms for double jeopardy revolve around the absence of being exposed to multiple trials or penalties for a single wrongdoing. This concept ensures that individuals are protected against the potential of enduring unjust or excessive legal consequences.
The opposite of double jeopardy pertains to circumstances where a person can face retrial or further punishment following an initial legal proceeding. This ensures that justice can be pursued thoroughly and effectively without being hindered by restrictions against repeated legal actions. Antonyms for double jeopardy uphold the principle of fair and impartial legal proceedings that guarantee accountability for unlawful behavior while also safeguarding individuals against the risk of enduring repetitive prosecutions.
In essence, antonyms for double jeopardy serve as a legal safeguard to prevent individuals from being subjected to repeated trials or penalties for the same crime. This concept ensures that the legal system functions justly and effectively by striking a balance between prosecuting wrongdoing and protecting individuals from the burden of enduring endless legal battles or punitive actions.
35 Antonyms for DOUBLE JEOPARDY With Sentences
Here’s a complete list of opposite for double jeopardy. Practice and let us know if you have any questions regarding DOUBLE JEOPARDY antonyms.
| Antonym | Sentence with Double Jeopardy | Sentence with Antonym |
|---|---|---|
| Single | The suspect faced double jeopardy when tried for the same crime twice. | The suspect faced a single jeopardy when tried for the same crime once. |
| Clear | The case is clouded with double jeopardy, making it difficult to prosecute. | The case is free from any jeopardy, making it easy to prosecute. |
| Innocence | Reopening the case would remove double jeopardy and allow for a fair trial. | Reopening the case would restore innocence and allow for a fair trial. |
| Safety | The concept of double jeopardy protects individuals from being tried twice for the same crime. | The lack of safety in the legal system can lead to multiple trials for the same offense. |
| Exoneration | The individual was unable to seek exoneration due to double jeopardy laws. | The individual was able to seek exoneration due to the absence of any jeopardy. |
| Protection | The law aims to provide double jeopardy protections to prevent unfair prosecutions. | The law lacks protection when individuals can be retried for the same crime. |
| Redemption | The suspect believed that escaping double jeopardy was a form of redemption. | The suspect sought redemption through a fair and just trial. |
| Clarity | Removing double jeopardy in the legal system brings forth clarity and finality. | The absence of any jeopardy ensures the trial’s clarity and finality. |
| One | She hoped for double jeopardy protection as she faced trial for the second time. | She hoped for one jeopardy protection, avoiding multiple trials. |
| Guilt | The lack of double jeopardy laws allows for guilt to be proven beyond reasonable doubt. | The presence of guilt was evident in the lack of any jeopardy. |
| Safety | The rule against double jeopardy aims to ensure the safety of individuals from repetitive prosecutions. | The absence of any jeopardy can compromise the safety and rights of individuals. |
| Acquittal | The defendant was saved from double jeopardy by obtaining an acquittal in the first trial. | The defendant faced no risk of retrial due to the initial acquittal. |
| Closure | Experiencing double jeopardy can delay closure for victims and the accused. | Resolving the case without any jeopardy can bring about immediate closure. |
| Fairness | Double jeopardy laws protect individuals from unfair and repetitive prosecutions. | The absence of any jeopardy can raise questions about the trial’s fairness. |
| Conviction | The suspect appealed the decision, arguing that double jeopardy should have prevented his conviction. | The suspect’s not-guilty plea was clear evidence against any conviction. |
| Freedom | The absence of double jeopardy allows for the continued pursuit of freedom and justice. | The presence of freedom was evident with the removal of any jeopardy. |
| Protection | Double jeopardy laws were created to provide protection against repeated prosecutions. | The legal system failed to offer protection when no jeopardy laws were enforced. |
| Half | Facing double jeopardy meant the accused was at risk of serving half their life in prison even if found not guilty. | Facing no jeopardy allowed the accused to serve a full sentence upon conviction. |
| Resolve | Dealing with double jeopardy can hinder the resolution of legal matters efficiently. | No jeopardy ensures swift and conclusive resolution in legal processes. |
| Acceptance | The defendant had to accept the outcome of the trial due to double jeopardy laws. | The defendant refused to accept the verdict, as acceptance wasn’t a factor without any jeopardy. |
| Exempt | Being under double jeopardy situations implies being exempt from further prosecutions. | Being free from any jeopardy means being under full scrutiny and potential trials. |
| Pardon | The defendant believed that double jeopardy laws acted as a form of pardon. | The defendant sought a presidential pardon due to no protection from any jeopardy. |
| Vindication | The accused felt vindicated after successfully invoking double jeopardy laws. | The lack of any jeopardy prevented the feeling of vindication even after the trial. |
| Upheld | The decision was upheld, despite concerns about possible double jeopardy in the case. | The verdict was overruled due to the lack of any upholding principles in the trial. |
| Single | The suspect avoided double jeopardy by committing only a single crime instead of multiple offenses. | The suspect faced no jeopardy due to having committed only a single offence. |
| Cooperation | The legal team worked closely to navigate through double jeopardy issues in the case. | The absence of any jeopardy allowed for seamless cooperation among the legal team. |
| Resolve | The case can be resolved with finality once double jeopardy concerns are addressed. | The case remains unresolved due to the absence of any jeopardy in the proceedings. |
| Harm | Double jeopardy laws protect individuals from potential harm from multiple trials. | The risk of harm was heightened in the absence of any jeopardy laws. |
| Dilemma | Escaping double jeopardy lifted the legal dilemma faced by the defendant. | The defendant found themselves in a fresh dilemma without any jeopardy protections. |
Final Thoughts about Antonyms of DOUBLE JEOPARDY
In the legal context, the concept of double jeopardy refers to the protection against being tried twice for the same offense. This safeguard ensures that individuals are not subject to multiple trials for the same crime, preserving their rights and preventing potential abuse of the legal system. Conversely, without this protection, individuals could potentially face repeated prosecution for the same alleged wrongdoing, leading to unnecessary stress, time, and resources spent on defending against the same charges repeatedly.
By upholding the principle of double jeopardy, the legal system seeks to uphold fairness, prevent abuse, and promote efficiency in the administration of justice. This protection is crucial in maintaining the integrity of the legal process and safeguarding individuals from unjust proceedings.